AI website builders to Wix Studio: the complete migration guide

Yes, as a rebuild rather than an import. Wix states that importing a site created outside of Wix isn't supported, and a React codebase isn't something Wix Studio can ingest anyway. What moves is the content: your copy, images and data come out of the repo and the database, and go into Wix CMS collections where someone can actually edit them. The same answer applies to Bolt, v0 and Replit. The design gets rebuilt, and on most AI-generated sites that's the part people wanted changed regardless.

All four, yes, and this is worth saying because the internet keeps claiming otherwise. Lovable offers a direct download on paid plans plus two-way GitHub sync. Bolt has Export then Download, and a GitHub integration. v0 says you can export the code to work locally, and Vercel states it doesn't own code generated from your prompts. Replit has Download as zip and a Git pane. Two cautions: Lovable's direct download is paid-plan only, so free-tier projects come out through GitHub, and Bolt warns that disconnecting a project is permanent, so don't disconnect anything until the export is verified.

Because it probably is, to them. Lovable's documentation says prerendered HTML is served only to verified search and AI crawlers, and that third-party SEO scanners and other unverified agents see the regular single-page app. So your agency's crawler gets a shell while Google gets a rendered page, and the site looks catastrophically broken in every audit tool while ranking normally. The reliable check is Search Console's URL Inspection, which shows what Google actually holds. This alone is worth knowing before anyone panics or pays to fix a problem that isn't there.

They can, and whether yours does depends heavily on which platform and which era. Lovable moved new projects to server-side rendering in May 2026 and didn't force older projects across, so a project's creation date decides how it renders. Bolt states plainly that most Bolt sites are built with JavaScript that crawlers and social platforms can't run directly, and offers prerendering as an add-on, which its own docs say to switch off for Next.js projects because of a noindex issue. So indexing on these platforms is a feature you enable, verify and keep working. Ranking is a separate problem again, and no platform solves that one.

It comes out by hand, and it comes out first. Lovable documents no one-click migration from its built-in Cloud backend to your own Supabase project, and tells you to export your database and download any storage files before continuing. Removing Cloud permanently deletes the instance. Bolt's built-in database is a bigger unknown: Bolt doesn't document what powers it or how you export from it, so open a support ticket before you plan around it. Replit's database is standard Postgres and a self-connected Supabase instance is too, so both dump normally. Whatever the source, the content that belongs on the marketing site becomes Wix CMS collections.

Not really, and this is the reason most of these projects come to us. None of these four ships a CMS. What they ship is a visual editor that rewrites source code: Lovable's Visual Edits, Replit's Element Editor, v0's Design mode. There's no content model, no draft and publish, no scheduling, and no roles. Lovable meters inline text edits above a daily allowance and counts element selection as chat usage, and Replit routes larger edits back through its agent, which consumes credits. So editing a sentence is a build change with a running meter. On Wix Studio it's a permissions setting.

Not currently, and the source for that is Wix. Its own help centre states it isn't possible to move or convert a site created with Wix Vibe to another editor such as the Wix Editor or Studio Editor, and files the request as an open feature request collecting votes. Worth knowing before you start, because Wix bought Base44 in June 2025 for around $80 million in cash plus earn-outs, so Vibe is not a side project and the one-way door is a deliberate current state rather than an oversight. If you're choosing where to build now and you can already name something Vibe won't do, build on Studio.

This is the first question we ask, and sometimes the answer means we tell you not to hire us. If your pages present information and persuade people, that belongs on Wix Studio. If your product does work, holds state, or shows every user something different, it doesn't, and moving it would be a downgrade dressed as a migration. The common outcome is a split: the marketing site moves to Studio so it can be edited and found, and the application stays where it is and gets linked from the navigation. That gets you a site your team can run without touching the thing that actually needs a developer.

From €1,750, quoted as a fixed price before anything starts, and two to five weeks from kickoff to launch plus a 30-day monitoring window that runs while you're already live. These are usually the fastest migrations we do, because the sites are young, the route list is short and there's rarely much indexed history to protect. The variables are how much content has to be lifted out of components into a CMS, and whether there's a provisioned backend whose data needs to come with you. Worth weighing against it: what you currently spend on credits and hosting.

The export half is genuinely easy, easier than any other platform we migrate from, because all four hand you the code. Where it turns is that having the code doesn't help you: there's nothing on the Wix side to import a React repo into, so the front end is rebuilt regardless of what you're holding. The parts people underestimate are lifting copy out of components into a content model that someone can actually maintain, getting a provisioned database out cleanly, and auditing what search engines see rather than what the browser shows. The reliable signal is whether you can name the collections your content should live in. If you can't, that's the part worth handing over, because rebuilding the same hard-coded pages in Studio just moves the problem.